as Eve already knows
Art is often the first thing to suffer for censorship. If it is not the first, it is one of the first---and it is always one of the first. One would wonder why this might be; I should hope I see, but I believe I do.
Plato first argued against art, declaring it dangerous, a potential corrupting force, which, if unleashed, could apply itself equally to education and to ethics. The artist, he felt, produced a shoddy replica of a shoddy replica, and drew attention further away from all ideas, although the real world already did that quiet reliably. Art was twice removed from truth, according to this imitation theory, deceptive due to its inaccuracy.
Artists may use lies, but artists use lies to tell the truth. The truth is this: Any revolution relies on anger. Anger relies on reason. The chief reason for revolting is oppression, when the oppressed people have had enough of being treated as inferior---not just to their oppressors, but to their known, innate worth. Art is a reminder of that worth, and that reminder is all but essential to the element of self-respect in anger as a reaction to oppression, as the idea of revolution. The masses' memory is notoriously short; something of the eternal must be seen, to echo in the soul. 'I', one may say, 'have felt love and hate and fear and hope as strongly as this man, or that, or another yet, has writ or wrought to show it; I have, as any man will and as every man must!'
If one would forget that---that every man must love and hate and hope and fear---one will not listen to art of ages past, but to the authority of the present. One will listen, and begin to believe, and in believing lose that self-respect. They say that we are incoherent and incompetent, that we are only ugly and unfinished. We are not. We are everything…
and we must always remember
